Skip to content

Pricing Research Methods ​

Contents ​

  • Van Westendorp Price Sensitivity Meter (The Four Questions, How to Analyze, Survey Tips, Sample Output)
  • MaxDiff Analysis (How It Works, Example Survey Question, Analyzing Results, Using MaxDiff for Packaging)
  • Willingness to Pay Surveys
  • Usage-Value Correlation Analysis

Van Westendorp Price Sensitivity Meter ​

The Van Westendorp survey identifies the acceptable price range for your product.

The Four Questions ​

Ask each respondent:

  1. "At what price would you consider [product] to be so expensive that you would not consider buying it?" (Too expensive)
  2. "At what price would you consider [product] to be priced so low that you would question its quality?" (Too cheap)
  3. "At what price would you consider [product] to be starting to get expensive, but you still might consider it?" (Expensive/high side)
  4. "At what price would you consider [product] to be a bargain—a great buy for the money?" (Cheap/good value)

How to Analyze ​

  1. Plot cumulative distributions for each question
  2. Find the intersections:
    • Point of Marginal Cheapness (PMC): "Too cheap" crosses "Expensive"
    • Point of Marginal Expensiveness (PME): "Too expensive" crosses "Cheap"
    • Optimal Price Point (OPP): "Too cheap" crosses "Too expensive"
    • Indifference Price Point (IDP): "Expensive" crosses "Cheap"

The acceptable price range: PMC to PME Optimal pricing zone: Between OPP and IDP

Survey Tips ​

  • Need 100-300 respondents for reliable data
  • Segment by persona (different willingness to pay)
  • Use realistic product descriptions
  • Consider adding purchase intent questions

Sample Output ​

Price Sensitivity Analysis Results:
─────────────────────────────────
Point of Marginal Cheapness:  $29/mo
Optimal Price Point:          $49/mo
Indifference Price Point:     $59/mo
Point of Marginal Expensiveness: $79/mo

Recommended range: $49-59/mo
Current price: $39/mo (below optimal)
Opportunity: 25-50% price increase without significant demand impact

MaxDiff Analysis (Best-Worst Scaling) ​

MaxDiff identifies which features customers value most, informing packaging decisions.

How It Works ​

  1. List 8-15 features you could include
  2. Show respondents sets of 4-5 features at a time
  3. Ask: "Which is MOST important? Which is LEAST important?"
  4. Repeat across multiple sets until all features compared
  5. Statistical analysis produces importance scores

Example Survey Question ​

Which feature is MOST important to you?
Which feature is LEAST important to you?

□ Unlimited projects
□ Custom branding
□ Priority support
□ API access
□ Advanced analytics

Analyzing Results ​

Features are ranked by utility score:

  • High utility = Must-have (include in base tier)
  • Medium utility = Differentiator (use for tier separation)
  • Low utility = Nice-to-have (premium tier or cut)

Using MaxDiff for Packaging ​

Utility ScorePackaging Decision
Top 20%Include in all tiers (table stakes)
20-50%Use to differentiate tiers
50-80%Higher tiers only
Bottom 20%Consider cutting or premium add-on

Willingness to Pay Surveys ​

Direct method (simple but biased): "How much would you pay for [product]?"

Better: Gabor-Granger method: "Would you buy [product] at [$X]?" (Yes/No) Vary price across respondents to build demand curve.

Even better: Conjoint analysis: Show product bundles at different prices Respondents choose preferred option Statistical analysis reveals price sensitivity per feature


Usage-Value Correlation Analysis ​

1. Instrument usage data ​

Track how customers use your product:

  • Feature usage frequency
  • Volume metrics (users, records, API calls)
  • Outcome metrics (revenue generated, time saved)

2. Correlate with customer success ​

  • Which usage patterns predict retention?
  • Which usage patterns predict expansion?
  • Which customers pay the most, and why?

3. Identify value thresholds ​

  • At what usage level do customers "get it"?
  • At what usage level do they expand?
  • At what usage level should price increase?

Example Analysis ​

Usage-Value Correlation Analysis:
─────────────────────────────────
Segment: High-LTV customers (>$10k ARR)
Average monthly active users: 15
Average projects: 8
Average integrations: 4

Segment: Churned customers
Average monthly active users: 3
Average projects: 2
Average integrations: 0

Insight: Value correlates with team adoption (users)
        and depth of use (integrations)

Recommendation: Price per user, gate integrations to higher tiers

Released under the MIT License.